“There are two aspects here to emphasize. First, my expectation as supervisor is that I am not confronted with the student as a typical researcher. My expectation is that the student has interest in the topic of research (and the topic to be researched). Second, I have the expectation that the student is willing to provide high quality. The drive to provide quality is a mindset that I expect. But the gap between what I can expect and what the result will be is massive.

This has consequences for how I will evaluate the thesis. As a supervisor, I have two options. First, I delegate the thesis to some extent. Or, second, I reframe my proposition and view the student by taking the approach a typical consultant would take. A consultant is a connector between scientific methods and the practice. If the student manages to reach the level of a consultant, he or she is already performing very well. If the student can go a bit beyond that level and show that they can apply scientific methods as per the current academic practice in research, so much the better.”

(Urs Jäger)

Previous
Previous

Something of interest

Next
Next

Leaving a mark